<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Pravda on Media and Technology  - Latest Comments in To Blog or not To Blog</title><link>http://pravdam.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://pravdam.disqus.com/to_blog_or_not_to_blog/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 11:49:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: To Blog or not To Blog</title><link>http://pravdam.com/2007/05/23/to-blog-or-not-to-blog/#comment-9317572</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If people are actively reading the blog, I'm sure they would expect a daily source of *something*. They would also expect it to be quality. Perhaps when there is nothing to be written on a certain day, the author could leave an interesting link for the reader to divert to, or just a "hello, here's my excuse for not writing."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We imagine that our newspapers come on schedule, but blogs are a bit more personal - direct to the author. So, I wouldn't imagine a print columnist to say "I don't have anything interesting for you today, check this out instead: ___ ." However, it may be appropriate for a blogger.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 11:49:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: To Blog or not To Blog</title><link>http://pravdam.com/2007/05/23/to-blog-or-not-to-blog/#comment-9317571</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm among the notion you should write every day, but I don't practice what I preach.  Forcing yourself to write is good because it makes you think even though you may not have much to write about. It's an exercise of the mind.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">zemote</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 11:39:20 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>